Language:
1. A system
of objects or symbols, such as sounds or character sequences, that can be
combined in various ways following a set of rules, especially to communicate
thoughts, feelings, or instructions.
In a broader sense Language is how we use intricate conventionalized systems of rules to relate to the world around us. It’s because of Language that we are able not just to communicate but to learn and even think to certain degree. When using the term language we normally associate it with Spoken/written language because it’s the most conventionalized system of communication developed. Using symbols to create meaning makes written and spoken communication possible.
In a broader sense Language is how we use intricate conventionalized systems of rules to relate to the world around us. It’s because of Language that we are able not just to communicate but to learn and even think to certain degree. When using the term language we normally associate it with Spoken/written language because it’s the most conventionalized system of communication developed. Using symbols to create meaning makes written and spoken communication possible.
Art itself could be considered as
a language as it draws from symbolic use of representation and objects to
convey meaning and communicate, but as it doesn’t depend on a strict set of
rules or a specific system of symbols it would not be considered a language by
its own, instead it works by combining these systems of communication and
representation in a “free” and subjective way. Art is nurtured by language and
has the ability to modify and or recombine existing forms of language.
Photography naturally uses visual language as a representational symbol that stands for something else. (A photograph of a dog describes a dog and to a certain or lesser degree exemplifies the idea of “dog”. but it IS NOT a dog.) It works as a communicational tool related to the real subject, it stands for it. Photography may also work on a meta-linguistic level in which it combines forms of communication that can be of visual indexical nature (the photo of the dog) and symbolic nature (the word dog) as spoken symbols are visually available as written language and therefore be subject of visual photography adding layers of depthless and meaning to the visual communication.
Here are some Artists who work by mixing “spoken alphabetical written” language with Visual indexical photography to create unique bodies of work.
Matt
Siber.
Statement by the author:
The Untitled Project is rooted in
an underlying interest in the nature of power. With the removal of all traces
of text from the photographs, the project explores the manifestation of power
between large groups of people in the form of public and semi-public language.
The absence of the printed word not only draws attention to the role text plays
in the modern landscape but also simultaneously emphasizes alternative forms of
communication such as symbols, colors, architecture and corporate branding. In
doing this, it serves to point out the growing number of ways in which public
voices communicate without using traditional forms of written language.
The reintroduction of the text takes written language
out of the context of its intended viewing environment. The composition of the
layouts remain true to the composition of their corresponding photographs in
order to draw attention to relative size, location and orientation. The
isolation of the text from its original graphic design and accompanying logos,
photographs and icons helps to further explore the nature of communication in
the urban landscape as a combination of visual and literal signifiers.
Kenneth Lum.
Lum´s work is visually similar to some of the non photographic work of John Baldessari. Both Text and photography interplay in a symbiotic way in which text works as a guide for the understanding of the staged situational photograph. It could also be said that the photograph operates as an example of the situation described in the text. Its interesting to note that the artist does not favor one or other language as both the photograph and the text appear on the same hierarchical level.
Lum´s work is visually similar to some of the non photographic work of John Baldessari. Both Text and photography interplay in a symbiotic way in which text works as a guide for the understanding of the staged situational photograph. It could also be said that the photograph operates as an example of the situation described in the text. Its interesting to note that the artist does not favor one or other language as both the photograph and the text appear on the same hierarchical level.
Wim Delvoye
The Belgian artist reflects about the relationships of
space and communication by digitally placing mundane day to day messages in
monumental mountains. The work takes personal experience and turns it into
universal matters, it also makes us aware of the discrepancy between our
everyday human experience and the larger forces of nature.
David Shringley
Brithish artist David Shringley work shines thanks to
its simplicity and humor. Inconsequencial and absurd signs work as visual puns
and aphorisms sometimes re enforcing the photograph and sometimes breaking the whole
meaning of it.
Noomi Ljungdell
Topography of the everyday is a work that supports
itself on the subjectivity of meaning and the inability to accurately translate
visual experience into written language without losing significance. Noomi
photographs, categorizes content and then replaces visual information with its
written equivalent. Signs remain floating in space but the viewer is unable to
translate this into clear meaning and is forced to read the fragmented “image”
and reconstruct significance based on its own experience.